I get into debates occasionally with my fellow colleagues or friends in the industry about Regular Premium ILP. It irritates me whenever I saw such plans being recommended. I'll always ask them why was this plan recommended and under what circumstances will the client buy the idea of getting such plan of substantially higher cost.
They will always give their views and I'll present mine but never into a heated argument. They offered valid views but I cannot accept it. Perhaps I can share with you how some people are being convinced into buying a regular premium ILP.
1) Spending more time on the concept of buy term, invest the difference and dollar-cost averaging* They will focus on this point and the potential returns. A lot of time will be spent in this area.
* As the clients get so focused on the concept and returns, agent is likely able put little emphasis into the charges in the later part.
* The client may not realise how these charges will eat into their so called "Potential Returns"
* However, when client start asking about charges, agent will start justifying by.....
2) Comparing a Life policy with an ILP* Life policy has no cash value in the 1st 3 years. ILP have cash value from year 1. So ILP better. * Life policy have their charges, ILP also have their charges. The charges are more transparent for ILP and you have the option on how you want to invest your monies. So ILP better
* With Life policy, you can only get $50k with $100/mth, with ILP, you can get $200k coverage. So ILP better
* With Life policy, you have to keep paying premium, ILP, you can take premium holiday and stop as and when you need to. So ILP better.
* With Life policy or Endowment, you need to take a policy loan if in need of money, with ILP, you don't need to as you can sell your units to get the money. So much flexibility. So ILP better.
* They can offer so many reason that it seem foolish not to get an ILP.
* However, if client is slightly smarter and asked about Term policy, agent will justify by saying......
3) Policy will not lapse compared to a Term policy* If you buy term policy and you forgot to pay premium, Term policy will lapse, ILP will not because there are units in .
* Client also scared after listening that they may really forget to pay premium for whatsoever reason and cover totally lapse.
* As the term plan used in ILP is Yearly Renewable Term riders, the premium will be slightly lower compared to a Level Term plan.
* If client ask why charges seems high, agent will say......
4) Bonus Units after X years* They focus on the bonus unit after, say 105% of value 7 years. Sounds like they are giving you $105/mth when you give them $100/mth. But after taking so much from you...
* Client always feel good when they feel that they are getting something free in return.
* When client still want to consider, agent can say......
5) We are having some promotion here.* If charges is not a issue to the client, there may not seems to be a reason to reject the agent.
* The agent can offer them some freebies such as vouchers, MP3, even LCD TVs, etc. We often seen these in roadshows
* This promotion is only for this roadshow. Since you are already planning to save, why not start today?
*******************
Some of the things the adviser will try not to reveal too much...1) Charges can be as high as 2 times your annual premium over the 1st 3 years. If you put $6,000 over 3 years, as much as $4,000 are paid to the company and agent.
2) Bid-offer spread are normally 5% compared to 2-3% for Unit Trust. For a $100/mth savings, it equates to 2-3% immediate loss to your savings from day 1.
3) Your insurance charges get so much higher, especially when you reach 40 yrs old. They will never tell you how much the same insurance cost at the age of 60.
4) Your monthly policy fees can be as much as $6/mth. If you are savings $100/mth, $6 are taken out and equate to 6% immediate loss to your savings.
5) They will try not to tell you how long your money will take to breakeven.
*******************
My views on the charges issue:* Ideally, zero charge with all the advices is the best for client. But it will also mean advisers like us can start eating grass. If client pay peanuts advisory fees or not even willing to pay a single cent for all the work and research the adviser did, then its not fair to the adviser as well.
* My colleagues said that I'm guilty of earning money which we rightfully deserve. There are actually nothing wrong with this plan. However, I still find the charges for a regular Premium ILP to be excessive and to be unacceptable. In my opinion, there must be a balance.
* Some company charge a more modest advisory fee like the Ideal Policy from NTUC Income and the achiever plan from AIA. Some are excessive like the Prulink from Prudential or Manulink from Manulife, etc
* IFA platform normally allow 100% allocation from day 1 for RSP(Regular Savings Plan). Lower Bid-Offer spread of 2.5% to 3% and but a wrap fee of 0.5% to 1%p.a. Its a very modest charge and allow most of clients money to tap into the investment from Day 1. Adviser will have a vested interest towards their clients money as well.
Well. I just like to refer to my previous posting. You decide if this is a lemon yourself.